|Mustering support: Experts term SC refusal to be audited ‘unconstitutional’|
12 October 2012
Faced with an adamant apex court, the Public Accounts Committee (PAC) on Thursday brought in legal experts to comment on the matter of auditing the judiciary’s accounts.
Some of the country’s top legal experts unanimously said that the Supreme Court’s decision to bar its registrar from appearing before the PAC is a ‘violation of the Constitution’ and an act that undermines the supremacy of parliament.
Those who expressed these views included President of the Supreme Court Bar Association Yaseen Azad, Justice (retd) Tariq Mahmood and Lahore High Court’s Justice Shabbar Raza Rizvi.
Since 2006, the Supreme Court has been refusing to allow the parliamentary financial watchdog to quiz its registrar over the apex court’s financial accounts.
The PAC had invited eight lawyers – three of them came to the meeting and two, Barristers Atizaz Ahsan and Wasim Sajjad, promised to submit their comments in writing. Hamid Ali and SM Zafar refused to give their views while former attorney general Makhdoom Ali was out of the country.
Mediation as last resort
The PAC would not tolerate violation of the Constitution, said committee chairman Nadeem Afzal Chan.
If this becomes a precedent, then every other department will refuse to appear before the PAC, citing the Supreme Court example, he added.
The body also accepted mediation offer of President SCBA Yasin Azad to resolve the standoff. Azad advised the committee to first exhaust all options and said he would personally take up the matter with Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry.
Constitutionally, the Supreme Court is bound to appear before the PAC since any department taking funds from the exchequer is answerable to parliament, Azad said. Referring to the apex court’s move to hold a full court meeting on the matter, Azad said there was no rationale for such a move.
The PAC decided that if Azad’s efforts fail to yield any result, it would send a notice to the registrar.
Who judges the judges?
Justice Mahmood said the money allocated to the Supreme Court does not belong to the court, or parliament. The money belongs to taxpayers and they have the right to ask, through their representatives, where and how the money is utilised, irrespective of “how big the recipient is”, he said.
According to National Assembly rules, the PAC can use coercive measures if a person refuses to appear before it, he added. He disagreed with the apex court’s views that it has internal mechanisms in place, and said that “no one should be judge of their own cause.”
The sitting judges are, no doubt, honest but what is the guarantee that in future all judges of the apex court will be honest, he questioned.
The strongest comments were given by Shabbar Rizvi who said: “Whosoever is obstructing constitutional obligations is violating the Constitution.”
Accountant General of Pakistan Revenue Manzar Mian said that all appropriation accounts related to the apex court were pending for last several years.
According to a brief, appropriation accounts involving Rs3.3 billion were pending for a decision before the PAC due to the Supreme Court’s refusal to appear before the committee.
The Auditor General of Pakistan said that only appropriation accounts were pending as no audit report involving the SC has been printed so far. He said all objections raised by the audit department were settled and in some cases recoveries were made. Where required, the court took necessary steps, he said.
The PAC barred the audit department from settling the Supreme Court’s objections as these powers rest solely with the committee.
|See Also in Political News|
|Billions in aid to Pakistan could stop: US|
10 December 2013
ISLAMABAD: US Defence Secretary Chuck Hagel warned Pakistani leaders on Monday that if they don’t resolve the protests stalling some military shipments across the border with Afghanistan, it could be difficult to maintain political support in Washington for an aid programme that has sent billions of dollars to Islamabad, defence officials said.
In response, the officials said, Hagel received assurances from the Pakistani authorities that they would take ‘immediate action’ to resolve the ... Full Story
|Pak-India nuclear war could kill 2 billion people: study|
10 December 2013
WASHINGTON: A nuclear war between India and Pakistan would set off a global famine that could kill two billion people and effectively end human civilization, a study said on Tuesday.
Even if limited in scope, a conflict with nuclear weapons would wreak havoc in the atmosphere and devastate crop yields, with the effects multiplied as global food markets went into turmoil, the report said.
The Nobel Peace Prize-winning International Physicians for the Prevention of Nuclear War and ... Full Story
|Imran threatens to boycott LG polls|
10 December 2013
LAHORE: Imran Khan on Monday threatened to derail local government polls in Punjab if his Pakistan Tahrik-i-Insaf (PTI) would not be given a guarantee about transparency. He also directed his party men to prepare for the next general elections, claiming it would be held sometime in summer next year.
Talking about alleged rigging in 2013 general elections at a party workers meeting here in a local hotel, he said the mandate of the present government would prove bogus as it would not be able to ... Full Story