|Govt’s counsel unable to name supporters of new law|
02 August 2012
While the legal representative of the federation might have said a bit too much during Tuesday’s proceedings of the contempt of court law case, he found himself at a loss for words on Wednesday.
A five-member bench of the Supreme Court had asked Abdul Shakoor Paracha to name any one parliamentarian who had spoken in favour of Contempt of Court Law 2012.
On Tuesday, he admitted to the court that the new law could have been aimed at protecting the new prime minister from contempt charges, which had resulted in his predecessor Yousaf Raza Gilani’s disqualification
Justice Jawwad S Khawja observed that the purpose of going through the parliamentary debate was to try to understand the legislation. “We would like to save this legislation if we know the wisdom behind it,” he said.
Referring to the speeches of Pakistan Peoples Party’s Senator Aitzaz Ahsan and Senator Raza Rabbani, Chief Justice Iftikhar Muhammad Chaudhry noted they were not in favour of the new contempt law. “Kindly tell us if somebody had spoken in favour,” he added.
“Members of the treasury benches stated that section 3 of the new contempt law was in violation of Article 248 of the Constitution,” observed Justice Tassadaq Hussain Jilani.
Paracha, who took some time to answer the question, finally responded: “The debate in the Senate was good.”
He then continued submitting his arguments based on objections raised by over two dozen petitioners over the new law.
Paracha said parliament could grant immunity to anyone, as well as legislate on the subject of immunity, and the court could not declare its actions mala fide.
“We do respect parliament but it cannot amend the Constitution with a simple majority,” observed Justice Jilani. “Parliament can do it through a Constitutional Amendment,” he elaborated.
Responding to the judges, Paracha insisted the Constitution had not been amended, but there were lacunas in the old law that had been addressed. He further said that the judgment given in former premier Gilani’s case cannot be the basis for proceedings of another, he explained.
The bench, however, observed that one cannot nullify a judgment by amending the law – but it could be done through new legislation.
“Punishment of contempt is not for the ego of judges, it is for the dignity and majesty of the court,” the chief justice said, adding that the government should enhance this dignity.
Paracha concluded his arguments on Wednesday, paving way for Attorney General Irfan Qadir to address the court today (Thursday).
|See Also in Political News|
|Tripped units at Guddu fixed, power supply resumes|
25 May 2013
JACOBABAD: Fourteen tripped units of Guddu Thermal Power Plant and a technical glitch in Dera Murad Jamali grid station have been fixed on Saturday morning, Geo news reported
The power supply to affected parts of Sindh and Balochistan have also resumed following the removal of technical faults.
Earlier, KESCO sources said that power supply to Jafferabad and Nasirabad among various areas was halted as a technical fault had occurred in Dera Murad Jamali grid station.
On the other hand, ... Full Story
|PIA plane lands at Manchester airport, probe continues|
25 May 2013
LONDON: A Pakistan International Airline (PIA) passenger plane, which was forced to land at a London airport after two travelers threatened to ‘explode the plane’ during their argument, has now arrived at Manchester.
According to the sources, British police arrested two people on suspicion of endangerment of aircraft after diverting Manchester-bound PIA flight PK-709 to land at Stansted airport following a mid-air alert.
Both the British nationals of Pakistani origin were arrested after ... Full Story
|Deal with IMF now will be self-defeating: Sartaj|
25 May 2013
LAHORE : Pakistan’s new leadership expects first results of its planned steps to shore up its finances and ease a power crisis in two or three months and only then should decide whether and on what terms to seek an IMF bailout, a senior policy adviser said on Friday.
Most economists, lenders and rating agencies say that the nation’s finances have reached such a critical stage that a deal with the International Monetary Fund will be necessary and the sooner it comes the better.
But Sartaj Aziz, ... Full Story